I would include a spoiler alert here but will that be necessary for anyone having seen a preview to this hokum? Doesn't the trailer tell it all? And isn't this movie justly dismissed as a Fast and Furious rip-off? Answers: No. Yes. Yes.
Is this really what Aaron Paul (fresh from Breaking Bad), intended as a follow-up to the hit TV series in which he played a critical role? Maybe the money was too obscene to pass up or maybe he wanted to clear his acting palate with something bland and derivative before he moves up and away from Need for Speed.
Here is the synopsis; culled from the IMDB site because I'm too lazy at the moment to bother summing up this offal:
Hobbs has Dom and Brian reassemble their crew in order to take down a mastermind who commands an organization of mercenary drivers across 12 countries. Payment? Full pardons for them all.Did you get that? The movie is really one long chase scene with heaps of preposterousness thrown in to distract us from the dreary fact that this has all been done--and much better I might add--in the Fast and Furious series.
Make no mistake; the Fast and Furious series specializes in over-the-top, absurd and impossible action scenes too but the difference between that franchise and this franchise-hope-to-be-but-mercifully-won't is that the former makes it all entertaining and fun and stylish while the latter is just loud and fast and uninspired. What is particularly interesting about the F and F franchise--now heading into a seventh incarnation--is that it leaves the audience feeling the series has only just begun and a lot more won't be unwelcome.
Aaron Paul does his best in the lead and is a convincing car-stud but stock characters and a chick side-kick (Imogen Poots) with a British accent who shares not a modicum of chemistry with the leading man don't help. Who can blame them? It's almost as if the story and action were dreamed up by studio executives standing around a Coke machine in a company lounge. You know you're in a bad action movie when the scenes crafted to generate the most thrills actually lull a movie-goer to heavy slumber, which is what happened to me. Upon waking and seeing the action on screen, I said to myself "Oh, the movie is still playing." It's also alarming when upon being roused from a delightful snooze one finds one hasn't lost a thread in the storyline.
The plot always seemed vague to me while watching; the quest seemed too silly to be worth remembering or taken seriously. When it ended I was relieved to be leaving the theater; my fatigue not the product of a thrilling adventure but of unmitigated boredom. If I had only not bothered to wake up in the middle of the movie, I might have slept until the final credits but that would have been doing what the filmmakers intended.
No comments:
Post a Comment