Showing posts with label Peter Sarsgaard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Sarsgaard. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Pawn Sacrifice



**Spoiler Alert**

Director: Edward Zwick/Starring: Tobey Maguire, Liev Schreiber, Peter Sarsgaard, Lily Rabe and Michael Stuhlbarg

Director Edward Zwick knows how to film a battle; having distinguished himself with his Civil War drama Glory. His latest film depicts another battle; one less bloody but fraught with political implications; the historic chess match between Russian master Boris Spassky and American chess prodigy Bobby Fischer. The film not only captures the heightened tension of the matches themselves but the broader competitiveness of the Soviet and the U.S. governments, who viewed the duel as not merely a game but a test of cerebral superiority. But the film is more than the game; it also explores Fischer's infamous idiosyncrasies and paranoid psychosis; wonderfully dramatized by Tobey Maguire. Maguire's strong and nuanced performance is reason enough to see Zwick's film.

The Cold War zeitgeist and the mania surrounding the match; in the media and popular culture, are also grippingly recreated, lending Pawn Sacrifice a potent authenticity and poignant context.

We see Fischer's early life; his exceptional skills draw the attention of Brooklyn chess club president Carmine Nigro (Conrad Pla), who defeats the young boy in an informal match but recognizes his sophisticated play. Fischer walks away from the table in a rage, tears streaming down his cheeks but returns to the table with a jungle-cat's resolve. In a montage, we see him taking on adult players and accepting an award for being the youngest grand-master in the country. Later, we see Fischer as a young adult; telling a reporter he hopes to play and defeat the Russians, who are considered to be the best in the world.

As Fischer becomes a formidable player on the international scene, he is finally able to take on the Russians in a tournament held in Los Angeles. We see how critical the matches become for the Russian and American governments. Fischer's victories over ranked Russian players is given a spin by the Soviets when one player attributes his defeat to the flu. Meanwhile, a shadowy American government official approaches Fischer, and is keen to remind him the powers-that-be are no less interested than their Russian counterparts in the outcome.

Though Fischer is able to defeat the best Russian players, he falls to Spassky (Liev Schreiber), which triggers erratic behavior. Wandering aimlessly after his defeat, Fischer finds himself waking on a beach. While looking around him, he sees Spassky on the beach with several Russian aids. Fischer, roused by the sight of his competitor; approaches Spassky, shouting angrily "I'm coming for you!"

Fearing for her brother's mental health, his sister Joan (Lily Rabe), consults a psychiatrist about his behavior; hoping for a cursory diagnosis. She tells Father Bill Lombardy (Peter Sarsgaard), Fischer's unofficial aid and Paul Marshall (Michael Stuhlberg), the U.S. government official assigned to her brother that his letters reveal a paranoid psychosis, which she believes is brought on by the stress of intense competition.

In a scene reminiscent of a moment in the film The Conversation, we see Fischer dismantle his hotel room, searching for eavesdropping devices he believes have been concealed. Lombardy walks in to find the chess prodigy surrounded by debris and junk that were once furniture and electronic devices. Fischer becomes suspicious of everyone around him, even going so far as to direct accusatory statements at Lombardy and Marshall.

Fischer's aberrant behavior reaches a peak in Iceland, during the series of historic matches between himself and Spassky. In their first match, ambient sounds trouble him to distraction, including the near imperceptible whir of a camera motor, as well as the coughing and clearing of throats in the audience. After Fischer loses the first match, he makes what Lombardy sees as impossible demands for the second. Though some, including Spassky, see Fischer's demands as evidence of his fear of losing, Lombardy believes the fear of winning is the actual motivation. Among Fischer's demands are that the second match be played in a quiet ping-pong room without audience presence and that the camera be re-positioned to limit further noise. After Spassky and the sponsors agree to Fischer's demands, the matches resume while the audience--and the world at large--watch the intense competition via camera. As Fischer scores a victory, the momentum shifts. A particularly interesting development is Spassky's behavior, which begins to mirror Fischer's. Spassky rises from the table to inspect his chair, trying in vain to locate vibrations only he detects. He briefly causes a commotion when he turns over his chair to search for the vexation, only to find nothing.
As the film suggests, a touch of madness might be a byproduct of genius-level chess competition.

Though the outcome of the matches is widely known, Zwick nevertheless wrings every atom of suspense from the competition, which is regarded in chess circles as the greatest ever.

Maguire is an actor who has never been given his due. Here he gives a taut, powerful performance; showing us Fischer's genius and overpowering madness. Maguire's cherubic face is almost at odds with his blue eyes, which radiate his character's mental acuity and dangerous volatility. Schreiber is no less moving as Spassky. Observing Fischer, his expressions of amusement and bemusement are entertaining in themselves. Schreiber is an actor who can say so much without uttering a word, which serves him well in portraying the taciturn Spassky.

Zwick understands the significance of the Spassky/Fischer matches, which he articulates superbly to the audience. It is nice to be reminded, in this post-Cold War world, that something as seemingly frivolous as a chess match once carried geopolitical implications. Oddly enough, Fischer seemed to have not a care in the world for the politics surrounding the match; his obsession with the game wasn't mired in the mundane.

In the film's epilogue, we learn what became of the various participants, the rematch with Spassky and Fischer's subsequent flight from American authorities. But its Zwick's film that gives the events and the times attention-grabbing relevance. What began as a sensational sideshow of Cold War competitiveness became an iconic historical event. We so often see films dramatizing larger than life sporting events or celebrating famous athletes. It's refreshing to see a film about two ferocious competitors whose brilliance resides in the mind rather than the body. That madness sometimes attends genius seems readily apparent; a point the film makes convincingly.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

Black Mass



**Spoiler Alert**

Director: Scott Cooper/Starring: Johnny Depp, Joel Edgerton, Benedict Cumberbatch, Kevin Bacon, Dakota Johnson, Peter Sarsgaard, Jesse Plemons, Julianne Nicholson, Adam Scott and David Harbour

By now most people should be fairly familiar with the story of James "Whitey" Bulger; Boston's one time crime kingpin and leader of the notorious White Hill Gang; who operated with impunity in the 1970s' and early 80s'. His capture in 2011 made national headlines while a documentary by Joe Berlinger garnered critical acclaim in theaters in 2014. So, I pose a question once reserved for filmmakers who have seen fit to flood theaters with flicks about Steve Jobs: do we need another film about Bulger and if so, what more do we need to know? Director Scott Cooper (Out of the Furnace, Crazy Heart) must think the story is incomplete, for here we are again with Black Mass, based on the book of the same name by Dick Lehr and Gerard O'Neill. But Cooper's film isn't a biopic or even a character study. Though Bulger is the cynosural focus, it is his unholy alliance with the FBI that serves as the film's narrative center.

The story is told mainly in flashback, as we see respective members of the White Hill Gang sitting before an FBI agent, offering confessionals and relating their stories.

The film begins in mid-seventies South Boston. A south-side tough named Kevin Weeks (Jesse Plemons) guards the door to the bar which serves as Bulger's headquarters. When three men try to gain entrance, a brutal round of fisticuffs breaks out, which necessitates Bulger's intervention. Impressed by Kevin's scrappy defense, Bulger appoints the young man to his muscle detail.

As Bulger's gang makes incursions into Italian mob territory, an FBI agent assigned to rid the city of organized crime, John Connolly (Joel Edgerton) decides to enlist Bulger's help. What makes the idea particularly fascinating is Connolly's relationship with Bulger (a scary Johnny Depp), who was once a chum from his old south-side neighborhood. When the two meet, Bulger is wary of John's agenda. John proposes an alliance that would ensure the defeat of the Italian mobs in exchange for Bulger's complete freedom from arrest and FBI harassment. Seeing the deal as self-advantageous, Bulger agrees to an alliance in spite of his reluctance to help the FBI. Bulger's other ally is his younger brother Billy (Benedict Cumberbatch), a member of the Massachusetts state senate who turns a blind eye to his brother's illicit affairs.

John's deal with Bulger draws heat from his superiors; particularly his boss Charles McGuire (Kevin Bacon), who would like nothing more than to bring the kingpin to justice.

In early scenes, we see just how brutal Bulger can be when he and Kevin drive an Italian mobster to a secluded location before beating him savagely. Bulger's lack of concern about reprisals is consistent with his fearlessness and his disquieting volatility. Watching Bulger dispatch a fellow gang-member days after being challenged in the bar, we are never sure how he will behave or respond, which keeps associates (and the audience) in a constant state of anxiety and fear.

We also see some of Bulger's personal life. Bulger visits his girlfriend Lyndsey (Dakota Johnson) and his son Douglas. During a meal, Bulger is reprimanded by Lyndsey for giving their son advice on how to avoid being punished for hitting someone in the face. In another scene, we see Bulger having dinner with his brother and his mother; a momentary glimpse into his family life.

But mostly we see Bulger at work; encroaching on Italian mob territory and executing those who get in his way.

As time passes, Bulger provides the FBI with little in the way of useful information though John pressures him to honor his deal. McGuire begins to lose patience and begins to wonder why the FBI is letting Bulger operate with impunity.

In time, Bulger becomes more ambitious. His involvement in the business of the sport Jai-alai; a Latin-American sport that briefly gained popularity in the U.S. in the 1970s evolves from mild interest to active partner. Before long, Bulger wrests control of the business from its founders by intimidation and murder, drawing more of the FBI's attention and ire.

Connolly's wife Marianne (Julianne Nicholson), like her husband's FBI superiors, sees his partnership with Bulger for what it is; a dangerous and immoral conflict of interest. Connolly invites Bulger and a White Hill gang member to dinner where he and another agent named John Morris sit across a table. When Bulger asks John about his wife, he mentions that she is upstairs, feeling ill. Bulger excuses himself from the table to visit her, which becomes a study in dark, psycho-sexual seduction and intimidation. Bulger is both menacing and creepy when he runs his hand over Marianne's face; her revulsion and fear palpable.

Before long, both McGuire and Fred Wyshak (Cory Stoll); an aggressive, results-oriented district attorney who is also eager to see Bulger behind bars pressure Connolly further. Wyshak's integrity is such that he refuses Connolly's bribe of two Red-Sox tickets; giving him a dressing down instead that leaves him speechless.

Where Bulger's ambitions lead is hardly a mystery. As I mentioned earlier, the story is so familiar now after Berlinger's film, and Scorcese's The Departed; another drama based on Bulger's life. I return to my earlier question: was this film necessary? I suppose it was if only to see Johnny Depp play something other than pirate Jack and Willy Wonka. His performance, though interesting, isn't really infused with any psychological depth or psychic backstory that might shed light on the man's mind. Maybe it's unfair to ask that of an actor playing someone who probably has no depth anyway. I think I've seen more than my fair share of mob films, like Goodfellas, set a nigh-impossible standard to overcome--which makes me ask what new ground does this film claim? There were facts about his life of which I was unaware, like the Jai-alai business, but the film merely fills in more details and facts. This is one time I would have liked to learn something of his upbringing as a "Southey" and his experiences in Alcatraz and Leavenworth that might have shaped his thinking and behavior, as well as his ambitions.

The supporting cast was quite terrific, particularly Joel Edgerton, Julianne Nicholson and Dakota Johnson, who showed more range here than 50 Shades.

High marks for the production design, which captured the gritty look of 1970s' Boston; aided in part by the use of city locales.

I enjoyed the film and Depp's Bulger, but as more time is displaced between me and the screening, it seems less impressive, in spite of the excellent performances. The photos of Depp in his blue contacts and slicked hair are something from a horror film rather than real life. His appearance is an exaggeration of Bulger's, which becomes more a distraction than an attempt at physical accuracy.

I wouldn't dissuade anyone from seeing Cooper's film. I might even recommend it but my recommendation would come buried under a pile of reservations. See it to see some fine acting and Johnny Depp or, if you can't get enough of Whitey Bulger, you might be inspired by that reason alone. Otherwise; I can't think of other reasons.