Showing posts with label Jamie Foxx. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jamie Foxx. Show all posts

Monday, December 1, 2014

Horrible Bosses 2



**Spoiler Alert**

Director: Sean Anders/Starring: Jason Bateman, Jason Sudeikas, Charlie Day, Jennifer Aniston, Christoph Waltz, Chris Pine, Jamie Foxx and Kevin Spacey

Yeah, accent on horrible.

You might wince in puzzlement after reading the post heading. Yes, why would I bother with excrement like Horrible Bosses 2 when it seemed like I had nothing but platinum-plated films to review in November? Shouldn't this movie have been assigned a January release? You know what the first month of the year means in American movie industry terms. It is that woeful time in the movie calendar when Hollywood has its own version of a tag-sale; when all the rubbish is discarded; hoping suckers (like me) will shell out green to see flicks better streamed than screened. More on that kind of cinema in January.

So what is my excuse for bothering you all with this nonsense? Well, it does boast a pretty decent cast; Christoph Waltz, Jason Bateman and Jamie Foxx, to name a few and it isn't so bad to see Jennifer Aniston in lingerie and acting randy but other reasons for seeing this film are meager or non-existent. Whew, what a waste of time!
If you didn't suffer the misfortune of seeing the first movie, I won't fritter your precious time with a recap. Suffice it to say Nick Hendricks (Jason Bateman), Kurt Buckman (Jason Sudeikis) and Dale Arbus (Charlie Day) are back from plotting the murder of their terrible bosses and are now poised to make it big with a new invention called Shower Buddy; a device that attaches to a shower head which dispenses shampoo that lathers immediately upon contact. The three men try to promote the product on Good Morning L.A. but Dale gets a bad case of camera fright and the name of their company, which is the trio's first names strung together; sounds vaguely like a racial slur, which doesn't sit right with the African-American co-host.

When the three men demonstrate their invention on camera, a raunchy and mildly amusing shower-scene follows where an unfortunate T.V. camera shot makes it appear Dale is stimulating Kurt with his hand and mouth.

The three hope to find investors for their invention and manage to attract the attention of a father and son who run a successful catalog business. The son, Rex Hanson (Chris Pine) and his father, Bert Hanson (Christoph Waltz), place an order for 100,000 units to market in their catalog. Or so the men think. When they next meet Rex and Bert, the father announces they have cancelled their order and have designed their own version of the device, called the Shower Pal. Devastated and angry, the three men hatch a drastic plan to save their company. Kurt and Dale favor kidnapping Rex and holding him for a $500,000 ransom, which will keep their company solvent. The kidnapping plot involves a lot of noisy, idiotic chatter between Kurt and Dale, who can't seem to filter any numbskull idea that comes to mind. In fact, most of the movie seemed to consist of discordant, ear-lashing, volleys of inane comments between the two. It isn't exaggeration to say I came close several times to plugging my ears. If the noise was unbearable, the fact that it wasn't funny made it more insufferable.

Nick, ever the voice of reason and sense (and lower volume!), struggles to prevent Kurt and Dale's ill-conceived and ill-advised scheme from finding expression but ultimately fails. Part of their plan involves stealing nitrous oxide from Dr. Julia Harris (Jennifer Aniston); Nick's would-be lover from the first film who runs a support group for sex addicts. It is during one of her meetings when the three men sneak into her office.

In another scene that falls flat, Nick is inadvertently drawn into the meeting; believing it to be a gathering of recovering alcoholics. When asked to share an experience, he relates a heavy-drinking episode that just happens to carry homoerotic innuendo.
Why a dentist would conduct such a meeting inside her place of practice seems bizarre but it must have seemed like a good idea to the film's legion of screenwriters. It must have also been a way to have Dr. Harris be involved in a story that has little use for her except to fulfill a male-fantasy role.

When more of Kurt and Dale's lame-brained kidnapping ideas lead the three men to Rex's home, they accidentally inhale nitrous gas and fall asleep inside a closet. The next day they discover Rex inside their trunk, gagged. When they speculate as to how he got there, Rex leaps from the trunk and informs the men he did it himself. They learn soon after that Rex intends to be part of the kidnapping scheme, which the men have little choice but to consent to, given their dire financial situation. Rex asks the men to demand a 5 million dollar ransom, for which they will receive a substantial cut. Of course it seems ridiculous that anyone would agree to such a deal, given their betrayal by the Hansons', but aside from Nick, who voices his reservations, the other two foolishly agree to Rex's scheme.

The plotting and the actual execution of the plan round out the rest of the movie and, as one might anticipate, a double cross and car chase (one of very few inspired moments in the movie) and some more foolishness with Dr. Harris ensue but without much amusement, excitement or raunchy fun. What director Sean Anders' film is is a lot of noise, mostly generated by Kurt and Dale as their stream-of-consciousness yakking vies for ear-time.

The burning question that never yields a satisfactory answer is: why can't multiple screenwriters manage to write a funny script? The bigger, more pertinent question might be: why make a sequel to a movie that, in spite of its $100+ million gross, was painfully dim-witted and forgettable? I think I answered my own question. A healthy bottom line justifies everything I guess; even more sludge.

I think the UN should bestow on anyone who saves people from spending money on junky movies a special, humanitarian award. My few and dear readers, I would like to claim that accolade for myself. I want UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to recognize Al's Omniflick for its tireless efforts in discouraging movie-goers from sending their hard-earned currency to die in movie house cash registers. Yeah...my blog might one day share the esteem of such notable humanitarian organizations like Amnesty International, Doctors Without Borders and The International Red Cross.

...ZZZZZZZZ--huh? What? Wait a minute; was I dreaming?

Oh well.

Sunday, May 4, 2014

The Amazing Spider-Man 2



Director: Marc Webb, Starring: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Paul Giamatti

I won't bother with a spoiler alert because what could I possible spoil in summarizing a story one could easily discern from the preview. I also won't be verbose (I'll try not to be anyway) because it just plain bored me--my typical reaction to Marvel Comic adaptations.

Peter Parker's problems from the first Spider-Man continue though I couldn't remember what they were exactly and I couldn't tell if I were recalling the Tobey Maguire Spidey movies or the rebooted franchise. Does it all matter? Peter's girlfriend, cash-flow, and Aunt May troubles are the same though the villains are slightly different; this time an electrically-charged bad guy named Electro (Jamie Foxx) threatens the city, Spiderman and the power-grid.

The story involves many things at Oscorp; one CEO dies, the next assumes control, while the company develops or hopes to develop serums and high-tech gadgetry; which all threaten to fall into the wrong hands. All the villains seen in the movie are all connected to Oscorp. If you're like me, you grow sick of hearing the word Oscorp.

Electro is born, develops a destructive contempt for Spider-Man, fights him and blah ad infinitum. In Marvel adaptations, suspense is never really created because we know the hero is indestructible, which leaves him intact for sequels. The villians never really develop an edgy menace because they never have any agenda other than a single-minded hatred for the hero.

And what a weepy hero he is! Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man tears so often I thought the movie was financed by the Oxygen network. I realize he was trying to breath vulnerability into the hero to make him more empathetic but it became a bit much. Even Gwen Stacy didn't deluge us with the water-works. Maybe the radioactive spider should have bitten her instead of Peter Parker.

Aside from one significant twist at the end, nothing in the story is left to the unanticipated or unheralded. One knows where the story and characters are all headed and of course the movie lays the groudwork for the next film. The first Spider-Man series began auspiciously then gassed out quickly. The current franchise has gassed out quickly but the movie studio must sell merchandise and Taco-Bell must sell Spider-Man mugs and there must be a movie tie-in to the U.S. Postal Service and everything else, which leaves solid storytelling and thrills sadly beside the point.